Veltic vs Supabase
Supabase alternative: compare PostgreSQL and backend services for your use case.
Shared foundation
Supabase positions itself as a Postgres platform with authentication, storage, realtime and edge functions. Veltic combines PostgreSQL with long-running Node.js applications and persistent workers in one dashboard. Both run stock PostgreSQL with row level security, so schemas, migrations and policies carry across.
Where they differ
Supabase has an end-user authentication product and a mature client SDK; Veltic has neither. Veltic runs full Node.js applications and background workers as first-class resources; Supabase Edge Functions are request-scoped and run on Deno.
Both
Stock PostgreSQL, row level security, storage, realtime channels.
Supabase only
End-user authentication, client SDKs, a large extension catalogue.
Veltic only
Long-running Node applications and persistent workers in the same project.
Neither
Automatic multi-region failover. Both need a deliberate architecture for that.
The deciding question
If you need integrated end-user authentication and the Supabase SDK, evaluate Supabase. If you want a database, a complete Node.js application and long-running workers operated together, evaluate Veltic. A migration in either direction requires checking authentication, SQL extensions and API contracts.
Official sources
Comparisons reflect publicly documented behaviour at the time of writing and are not endorsed by the other vendors. Check their current documentation before making a decision.
Build the whole backend in one project
One plan, one dashboard, one command line interface. PostgreSQL, applications, functions, storage and realtime.